New Perspectives
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Home Perspective
|
|
Perspective 
|
|
Written by Posted by Editor
|
|
Sunday, 06 August 2006 |
|
PANOPTICON;
OR
THE INSPECTION-HOUSE:
CONTAINING
THE
IDEA OF A NEW PRINCIPLE
OF CONSTRUCTION
APPLICABLE
TO
ANY SORT
OF ESTABLISHMENT, IN WHICH PERSONS OF
ANY DESCRIPTION
ARE TO BE KEPT UNDER INSPECTION;
AND
IN PARTICULAR TO
PENITENTIARY-HOUSES,
PRISONS,
HOUSES OF INDUSTRY, WORK-HOUSES, POOR-HOUSES, LAZARETTOS, MANUFACTORIES, HOSPITALS,
MAD-HOUSES, AND SCHOOLS:
WITH
A PLAN OF MANAGEMENT
ADAPTED
TO THE PRINCIPLE:
IN A SERIES OF LETTERS,
WRITTEN
IN THE YEAR 1787, FROM CRECHEFF IN WHITE
RUSSIA.
TO A FRIEND IN ENGLAND
BY JEREMY BENTHAM,
OF LINCOLN’S
INN, ESQUIRE.
Have you ever wondered if there might be some hidden purpose in Homeland Security measures that have all the homies under seemingly constant surveilance yet seem never to search out the hidden dangers they claim to protect us from? This 1787 classic text may have more to say about contemporary life than the age of it would suggest.
Source: Bentham,
Jeremy The Panopticon
Writings. Ed. Miran Bozovic (London: Verso, 1995). p. 29-95
Transcription and HTML by Cartome
Full Text
Technorati Tags: fear, totalitarian, prison, Bentham, Panopticon, terror
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 August 2006 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Ulrich Duchrow - Articles |
|
|
|
|
Written by Posted by Editor
|
|
Friday, 04 August 2006 |
|
Ulrich Duchrow - Articles Online
Links to 15 articles available oline, in English, and to a brief biographical article, in German.
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 August 2006 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Posted by Editor
|
|
Tuesday, 01 August 2006 |
|
Books
Links to books available for online purchase.
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 August 2006 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Globalization and Racialization |
|
|
|
|
Written by Posted by Editor
|
|
Monday, 24 July 2006 |
|
Central among the concerns of the American Kairos effort is the racism that is endemic to our American culture. In the article, Globalization and Racialization, Dr. Manning Marable, Professor of Public Affairs, Political
Science, History and African-American Studies at Columbia University, grounds this power relation in the context of another of the central concerns of the American Kairos effort, globalism.
…the problem of the twenty-first century is the problem of global apartheid…
Inside the United States, the processes of global apartheid are best
represented by what I call the New Racial Domain. This New Racial
Domain is different from other, earlier forms of racial domination,
such as slavery, Jim Crow segregation, and ghettoization, or strict
residential segregation, in several critical respects. These earlier
racial formations or domains were grounded or based primarily, if not
exclusively, in the political economy of US capitalism. Anti-racist or
oppositional movements that blacks, other people of color and white
anti-racists built were largely predicated upon the confines or
realities of domestic markets and the policies of the US nation-state.
Meaningful social reforms such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the
Voting Rights Act of 1965 were debated almost entirely within the
context of America’s expanding domestic economy and a background of
Keynesian, welfare state public policies.
The political economy of the “New Racial Domain,” by contrast,
is driven and largely determined by the forces of transnational
capitalism and the public policies of state neoliberalism. From the
vantage point of the most oppressed US populations, the New Racial
Domain rests on an unholy trinity, or deadly triad, of structural
barriers to a decent life. These oppressive structures are mass
unemployment, mass incarceration, and mass disfranchisement. Each
factor directly feeds and accelerates the others, creating an
ever-widening circle of social disadvantage, poverty, and civil death,
touching the lives of tens of millions of US people.
full text
To disambiguate the terms globalism and globalization, see also:
Globalism Versus Globalization
|
|
|
Written by Posted by Reader
|
|
Sunday, 23 July 2006 |
The Devil's Brew of Poverty Relief
Conn Hallinan | July 19, 2006
....
Reforming Food Aid
Food aid policy in the United States, for which the total 2005
budget was $1.6 billion, is largely dictated by an “iron triangle” of
agribusiness, shipping magnates, and charity foundations. Studies
demonstrate that the most efficient way to deliver aid is to purchase
food locally rather than buy and ship it from the donor country.
But Washington insists that food aid must come from the United
States, be shipped on U.S. carriers, and distributed by agencies like
CARE and Catholic Relief Services. As a result, 60 cents out of every
aid dollar goes to middlemen for transport, storage, and distribution.
Four companies and their subsidiaries, led by agri-giants Archer
Daniels Midland and Cargill, sell more than half the food used by the
Agency for International Development. Five big shipping companies
dominate the transport side of the equation. And relief agencies, like
CARE and Catholic Relief Services, generate half their budgets by
selling some of the aid food....
full text
|
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 23 July 2006 )
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|